Ceci dit, il y en a quelques bonnes sur cette enfilade.
DR


Moi Claude j'ai vu pas mal plus de monde de ton côté que du côté de Moi et Réjean. Ceci dit, pour Aristée, ce sont des enfantillages de A à Z. Un conflit pour une toilette calvinsse.....claude lessard a écrit :Merci Aristée du es un des rares qui ont saisis le sens du refus de jouer de Kramnik,Je crois que ton explication est on ne peut plus clair!

Bien daccord que la dispute est enfantine en soi. Je pense que la faute en revient à l'équipe Topalov, qui a mal jugé les conséquences de leur "move" dans la partie psychologique. Ils ont fait une attaque sans voir qu'ils avaient une pièce en prise...Sébastien Nadeau a écrit :Moi Claude j'ai vu pas mal plus de monde de ton côté que du côté de Moi et Réjean. Ceci dit, pour Aristée, ce sont des enfantillages de A à Z. Un conflit pour une toilette calvinsse.....claude lessard a écrit :Merci Aristée du es un des rares qui ont saisis le sens du refus de jouer de Kramnik,Je crois que ton explication est on ne peut plus clair!
Sébastien



Le reste ne sont que des enfantillages d'éliteux !Bessel Kok a écrit : 1. The Appeals Committee made a wrong judgment and its decision to modify the playing conditions must be declared null and void.
2. Game five was started under playing conditions that were not mutually agreed by both players (and in fact explicitly rejected by one of them), so the game should be considered null and void.
3. Game five should start tomorrow, Monday, October 2nd, and the match should continue under the same playing conditions as agreed before.
4. The Appeals Committee should be dismissed and replaced by a Committee agreed by both players.
5. In the absence of an agreed Committee, the FIDE President is responsible for the duties of the Committee.
6. Proceed as quickly as possible with the outsourcing of all top-level chess competitions to a separate company manage by professional organisers.







Press release
Elista, 1 October 2006
On 29-30 September 2006, in City Chess the FIDE President has held several rounds of negotiations with the representatives of the World Chess Championship match participants. Despite existing deep contradictions in the approaches for the settlement of the conflict situation, the parties have succeeded in reaching considerable progress.
Firstly, the issue of the bathrooms for the players has been solved. The team of V. Topalov has agreed for opening the bathrooms in the restrooms of the players. Also, an agreement has been reached that the players will be using the restrooms permanently assigned to each of them during the whole duration of the match. The both teams will be provided with a possibility of thorough inspection of the respective opponent’s bathroom.
Secondly, the members of the Match Appeals Committee with the aim of assisting to the FIDE President in finding a solution in this conflict situation and fully realizing the necessity to continue the match,The petition has been satisfied. Until the appointment of the new members and their arrival in Elista, the functions of the Appeals Committee will be performed by the FIDE President.have submitted a letter with their voluntary resignation to the FIDE President.
At the same time there is a continuation of the negotiations in respect of the issues, which have remained unsettled. The FIDE President once again addresses both parties with an appeal to meet each other halfway in order to continue the match for the sake of the millions of chess fans who are impatiently waiting for the peaceful outcome of the conflict.
24:00h: FIDE Press Release 7 – Tomorrow 6th Game of the Match
After the numerous rounds of the negotiations with the teams of Veselin Topalov and Vladimir Kramnik, FIDE President Kirsan Ilyumzhinov managed to reach the considerable progress.
As it was informed before, the question on the bathrooms was solved positively by mutual agreement of both teams. After the voluntary resignation of the members of the 2006 World Chess Championship Appeals Committee, the new members of the Committee, who have already arrived to Elista, were assigned.
The FIDE President has made several proposals for further continuation of the match, which unfortunately were not accepted. After the detailed study of the current situation and the consultation with the FIDE Legal Advisor, the FIDE President decided:
Tomorrow, 2 October 2006, at 15.00, the 6th Game of the World Chess Championship Match Topalov-Kramnik with the score 3:2 in favour of Kramnik, will take place.


Bravo à Ilhumzhinov! C'est ce qui devait être fait.Nicolas Fillion a écrit :The FIDE President has made several proposals for further continuation of the match, which unfortunately were not accepted. After the detailed study of the current situation and the consultation with the FIDE Legal Advisor, the FIDE President decided:
Tomorrow, 2 October 2006, at 15.00, the 6th Game of the World Chess Championship Match Topalov-Kramnik with the score 3:2 in favour of Kramnik, will take place.[/b]


Non! Il n'a rien dans la politique du babillard que l'on accepte en s'enregistrant qui donne le droit a quiconque de barrer mes toilettes! Si mes toilettes sont barrer, je vais arreter d'ecrire sur le babillard et faire cesser le babillard d'exister! C'est une atteinte a mon integrite de babillardeur de vouloir m'enlever mes toilettes. J'ai le droit d'enfantiller autant que je le veux dans le plus pur esprit babillardien en ayant un acces illimite a mes toilettes!Maintenant, plus d'enfantillage, sinon je barre vos toilettes !


Personnellement, je ne suis pas pret a flusher le titre pour cette histoire de toilettes! Je sais, certains en sont convaincu, voire inconditionnels, mais cette idee me m'entre pas dans le crane. Je suis de ceux qui restent embourbe costamment dans les traditions! Ces contestations sans fondements me mettent dans une furie noire! J'ai envie de dire: "Toi le trouble-fete, cesses ces paroles!" Ces etres qui ne realisent pas que nous vivons dans le meilleur des mondes, qui veulent nous faire quitter pour un vilain continent! Si ce n'est que la seule chose que j'eu fait, au moins j'eu retrici l'impact de ces discours destructeurs!Luc a écrit :Sérieusement je me demande si ce ne serait pas plus simple d'avoir un système qui ressemblerait au tennis, avec des tournois chelem et un système de pointage qui dit qui performe le mieux.